Will you look at that. Someone in the mainstream is questioning the narrative.
The Covid Vaccines May Affect Periods. Are We Allowed To Talk About This?, Lara Prendergast, The Spectator, 21 August 2021
I feel a little uncomfortable bringing the subject to the pages of The Spectator. I do so because I was interested to read that British women have made 30,304 reports of changes to their periods after having received a Covid vaccine. I realised I am one of them.
I will spare the details but suffice to say that after I had my first jab of Pfizer in late May, my cycle was flung off course. … When I had my second dose, the man in the booth asked whether I had experienced any side effects. I mentioned the changes to my period. He logged it on my file, said it would be flagged to the MHRA scheme and a minute later a doctor rushed in to reassure me there was ‘no reason to be concerned that the Covid jab would affect my fertility’. I hadn’t asked if there was.
I wanted to ask how he could be so certain, given these vaccines are very new. But I was concerned that would make me sound loopy. Goody two-jabs that I am, I didn’t want a black mark next to my NHS number.
In the US, one research survey tracking menstrual changes brought on by the Covid jabs received 140,000 responses. The two biological anthropologists conducting the research said they had expected to receive around 500 when they launched their survey.
The real number of cases in the UK is possibly quite a bit higher than 30,304. But it is awkward talking about what the jab has done to our periods. Friends tell me they’ve also been affected and nope, they didn’t report it either. Nobody wants to be thought of as hysterical. Emotional. A tad neurotic. So instead these conversations are going on discreetly, on WhatsApp chats, on internet threads, in hushed tones. Who wants to be accused of being a dreaded ‘anti-vaxxer’?
Is it ‘anti-vaxx’ to be concerned that these jabs may be having an effect on our menstrual cycles?
Is it so wrong to talk about this? And if the jabs are affecting so many women’s periods, who knows what else might be going on. Medical trials on pregnant women were banned following the thalidomide scandal of the 1960s.
In another survey run by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in May, just under 60 per cent of pregnant women said they had declined the vaccine. … The official information sheet offers pregnant women two options: ‘Get a Covid-19 vaccine’ or ‘Wait for more information about the vaccine in pregnancy’. Pregnant women do not have oodles of time to wait. They could also be forgiven for thinking they are being somewhat strong-armed into taking the jab, given how keen the government is on pushing through vaccine documentation for the double-jabbed.
Women associate their periods with their fertility. And there is reason to believe that the Covid jabs are having an effect on some women’s periods. A month after my second jab, I make a note that my latest cycle is messed up, once again.
These are the words the author used that I saw reflected how she felt questioning a vaccine side effect:
A black mark next to my NHS number
“Accused of being a dreaded anti-vaxxer”
“Is it wrong to talk about this?”
“We can only hope and trust”
Feeling “strong-armed into taking the jab”
How did it come to pass that a strong woman is afraid of addressing her concerns – concerns that are valid and shared by thousands of people – because it may make her appear “loopy” or may earn her a “black mark”?
This isn’t right. Society should be encouraging and embracing debate, not squelching it. She should feel proud, not embarrassed. What is going on?